Layer 1

Pharmacists may have to supply sodium valproate in original pack

The MHRA has also been reconsidering the use of valproate to treat bipolar disorders
The MHRA has also been reconsidering the use of valproate to treat bipolar disorders

The MHRA is planning to consult on introducing a legal requirement for pharmacists to supply sodium valproate in its original pack in a bid to support its safe use, the DH said.

The Department of Health and Social Care (DH) published its response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review yesterday (July 21).

Former health minister Jeremy Hunt commissioned Baroness Julia Cumberlege to lead on the review in February 2018, asking her to “consider whether any further action is needed relating to the complaints around Primodos, sodium valproate and vaginal mesh”.

“Actions” on safe use of valproate

The review does not contain a “strategic recommendation” on the use of sodium valproate (valproate), the DH said in its response, but it offers a “number of actions” for improvement related to its use.

Among the changes being considered, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is “planning to consult on an amendment to the Human Medicines Regulations, which would require pharmacists to supply sodium valproate in the manufacturer’s original pack”.

“This will ensure that prescriptions for valproate are dispensed with a patient information leaflet (PIL) and information on risk minimisation measures,” the DH added.

The MHRA has also been reconsidering the use of valproate to treat bipolar disorders. “Clinical advice is that there are effective alternative treatment options for acute mania that are safer to use during pregnancy,” the DH continued.

“With respect to epilepsy, the MHRA will consider further whether the indications for paediatric use of valproate could be better specified in the product information to ensure the initiation of girls on valproate only occurs when strictly necessary,” the DH added.

Considerations for pharmacy professionals

In June, NHS England and NHS Improvement issued a letter to all women and girls aged 12-55 who are currently prescribed sodium valproate, raising some safety considerations.

Two days later, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) sent a reminder to all pharmacy professionals on how to safely supply valproate to women and girls.

It said that pharmacists must ensure that “the patient label is not placed over the warning labels or warning sticker on the box”.

“Women taking valproate have shared with us examples of where this has happened,” the GPhC noted.

It also asked pharmacy teams to ensure a patient card is provided every time valproate is dispensed and that, if repackaged, valproate should have a warning on the container supplied, along with a copy of the PIL.

“Valproate must not be used in any woman or girl able to have children unless there is a pregnancy prevention programme (PPP) in place,” the GPhC warned.

On January 7, the MHRA published findings from a review of the safety of antiepileptic drug use during pregnancy, concluding that lamotrigine and levetiracetam were overall the safer of the reviewed antiepileptic drugs for use by pregnant patients.

What advice can pharmacists give to pregnant patients with epilepsy? Refresh your knowledge with our CPD article.

4 Comments
Question: 
Do you think pharmacists should supply valproate in its original packaging?

Getting Shorter, Community pharmacist

"It said that pharmacists must ensure that “the patient label is not placed over the warning labels or warning sticker on the box”.

“Women taking valproate have shared with us examples of where this has happened,” the GPhC noted."

 

Have they seen the boxes? The large sides are covered with the warnings/card and the lot/bn... the thin sides are smaller than a label.

[bangs head against brick wall]

N O, Pharmaceutical Adviser

What about people on Compliance Aid? Drug misusers on controlled drugs and valproate on a daily or weekly pick up basis? Finally will the pharmacies be paid in full? Foe example Epilim chrono prescribed 21 supplied 30 get paid only for 21? Pharmacy inputs are vital before any legislative changes

C A, Community pharmacist

Each sub pack is a special container, so you should already be able to dispense 20 tablets against a script for 21 and get paid for it, assuming you needed to or wanted to, or 21 if you felt the clinical need. Currently you have to round down to the nearest subunit, so you wouldn't get paid for dispensing 30 tablets against a script for 21, but if the special container gets changed to the pack you would.

Epilim has been a special container for about a year - https://psnc.org.uk/our-news/21-products-reclassified-as-special-containers/

Per the updated SPC - 

Epilim is hygroscopic. The tablets should not be removed from their foil until immediately before they are taken. Where possible, blister strips should not be cut.

 

So there is an argument that you should already be dispensing 60 for scripts written as 56, and 110 tablets for scripts written for 112.

N O, Pharmaceutical Adviser

There is a big difference between Should be and what patients and GPs demand. Pharmacies always end up as losers.

Job of the week

Pharmacist Manager
Midlands, Cheshire & Dorset
Salary dependent upon experience